- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 09:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:WEB, WP:NN, WP:CORP, also Vanity, Advertising and to top it off, I can't find a google hit for it. Kershner 04:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable corporation. —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-19 05:50Z
- Delete per nom. --Coredesat 06:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable company; appears to be an advert for the company in order to boost its profile - reads as a corporate resumé rather than an encyclopedic article. (aeropagitica) (talk) 06:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Richardcavell 06:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - the fact that the author has the same name as the product is an even bigger giveaway that this is pure spam. Ace of Risk 15:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom — spamtastic. Grandmasterka 07:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.