- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 15:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Self-promotion of non-notable group promotion of non-notable bands (all but two of the 23 names are either redlinked or lead to unrelated disambigs or redirects. The two that have articles are not clearly notable either). Prod removed by creator without comment. Henning Makholm 21:41, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Grafikm_fr 21:52, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fagstein 06:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - who are you to grade their notability. Luka Jačov 08:46, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Luka. estavisti 14:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep really ugly article, but inclusionism or death. Notability is NOT a Wikipedia issue. --GTubio 15:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.