Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure Intent Buyer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 18:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pure Intent Buyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company, initially tagged as Prod per "Non blatant advertising" - tags removed by page creator. Uses primary sources as referencing, others referenced from Wikipedia directly, and various blogs. Not notable in this state, non-encyclopedic. BarkingFish 12:25, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete db-spam with doses of WP:OR and WP:CRYSTAL thrown in. EEng (talk) 15:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article is a bit of a mess, with various wikilinks as "references", making it awkward to see the wood for the trees. (To be fair, it is the contributor's first article.) I'm not seeing anything in the article as such that demonstrates WP:CORPDEPTH notability; it appears to be a company with possibly an interesting raison d'etre, but basically just a firm doing what firms do. I'd suggest it should be pushed into the Articles for Creation process, but I fear that it may ultimately become a disappointment for the new editor if it can never emerge from there with demonstrable notability. AllyD (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.