Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure dead brilliant
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pure dead brilliant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP is not a dictionary, or even a slang dictionary. We should not have articles on individual words, or three word expressions of which there are millions. Jaque Hammer (talk) 04:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 06:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball delete per nom. —Tamfang (talk) 00:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pure dead delete. Keep if my phrase catches on. Szzuk (talk) 20:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.