- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Purwien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Comprehensively fails music notability guidelines for a group or band as has no coverage in reliable sources, has not released an album or single that has charted, or undertaken a major tour and does not contain any notable members. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 14:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Article creator User:KenshinXSlayer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) removed the AfD template in this diff. [1]. I have revert this edit and placed a warning tag on their talk page. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Fails to meet notability requirements. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 02:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.