Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Push and pull factors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Human migration. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 01:34, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Push and pull factors

Original research, no references since 2006. The PROD tag was removed by an anon with no actual addition of refs. Legotech (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lots of Ghits, but I can't this becoming anything more than a definition. In fact, both push factor and pull factor are already in Wiktionary. So that would be a "push factor" outa here. Redirect per Dethme0w. Clarityfiend (talk) 16:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment - The term is also used in film sound work, which might account for some of the results. Torc2 (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced OR. Someone removed the {{originalresearch}} tag claiming the subject is covered in books, but after two years with no references (and none from the tag-removing IP), I don't think any are forthcoming. Dethme0w (talk) 18:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Human migration which lists push and pull factors. That article also needs refs badly, but at least it has virtually the same content, in context. Dethme0w (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great solution Dethme0w, looks almost like it could have been lifted from there to begin with. Legotech (talk) 21:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.