Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Putting accuracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This Article appears to be original research (personal essay) and a thinly-veiled advertisement (see final paragraph). --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 01:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, seems to be a guide about playing golf --TBC☆^{O M G!} 01:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - original research and advertising - Richardcavell 01:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unsourced and therefore unverifiable original research except for the last paragraph which is spam, per Richardcavell. Gwernol 02:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Cavell --Deville (Talk) 02:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete right into the hole, per AbsolutDan and Gwernol. Barno 03:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NOR Tyrenius 03:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, original research, ad. --Terence Ong 03:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 03:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. SorryGuy 05:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nominator. —Encephalon 05:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Wikipedia articles shouldn't talk to me. Danny Lilithborne 06:51, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, thinly veiled advertisement. JIP | Talk 10:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, advert. PJM 12:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Mystache 13:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Please --Optichan 17:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. OR, somewhat bizarre, no sources. Spam. First hit for "David Petz" is his site pushing his book. Herostratus 18:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. — TheKMan^talk 23:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.