Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyewacket (band)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 00:13, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Pyewacket (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article about a band fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for music (WP:MUSIC) as well as general notability guidelines (WP:N) due to a lack of sources. dissolvetalk 16:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper nom + I question how good those sources are.--Beachsand2004 (talk) 20:03, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This !vote has been struck as coming from a sockpuppet account. See this SPI. - The Bushranger One ping only 17:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing found to indicate any sort of encyclopedic relevance. --Michig (talk) 07:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.