- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sourcing is insufficient. Robertklay if you'd like to work on this in draft, please let me know. Star Mississippi 02:50, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pyin Khone Gyi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources used do not mention this village, the in-text citations are not properly sourced and poorly written. I would dratify but the user has also made a draft with the same name that failed AfC several times. Significant verifiability issues- Source analysis: source 1 is a wikimap; source 2 does not mention the village at all; source 3 is a link to a general database website's home page; source 4 is the same as source 2; source 5 is not a book but a reference to a map of roads (see [1]); source 6 and 7 talk about commercial developments and not the village, source 6 is a user-generated travel site EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:04, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:14, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:14, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough sources. ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 15:58, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. It is also promotional. ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 15:59, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Robertklay pinging you to post your comments here and not on the Talk page for this AfD. If you need more time to provide sources, the correct place for this to be is in Drafts, not on mainspace. Additionally the issue is specifically the unsourced content. The page for the source you've modified shows that Pyin Khon Gyi is a census-recognised village tract not a village. It gives only the population, gender ratio and household count. However, you used it to support the paragraph with statments like "Agriculture is the primary economic sector in Pyin Khone Gyi" and "Economic and business exchanges occur in Tahan and Letpanchaung Bazaar, famous trade centers in Kalay Township" EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 21:35, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- A page is for Pyin Khone Gyi village, which is under Pyin Khone Gyi Tract, Kalaymyo Township, Sagaing Region. It means Pyin Khone Gyiis that a village tract too. In Pyin Khone Gyi tract, there are seven villages groups; Pyin Khone Gyi, Yauk Cho Kwin, Pyi Daw THar, Thae Kung Nan, Maw Si, Segyi, Kan Thar. A village business and local market situation are showed in Kalaymyo business status like most peole go to Tahan Bazaar or Market. In town level or village level, they don't have specific declaration or information announced about local markets. These mean that a place we add or creating a page may face with many difficulties. Or if we need to add more specific photos or photo maps.Thanks for your patience. Robertklay (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- If there are no sources talking about it, it should not be on Wikipedia. The Kalaymyo Township report page 30 and page 53 do not talk about the village. They talk about the agricultural and retail statistics of the township, not the village or village tract. Your new link to the Khuado Puai has no mention of the village either. Original research and using photos and maps is not allowed (see: WP:OR). EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 13:19, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- In Kalaymyo General Administration Department report, they show village population status, business condition, agriculture improvement, and education level. In Pyin Khone Gyi page,It also has been added village population, economic condition, agriculture condition with related reports and page numbers. Some websites have been updated and later will be added continuously. Robertklay (talk) 12:37, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- In GAD report, page 30 shows all Kalay township( not only Kalaymyo but also all Kalay township) agriculture conditions.It means that what a villager are cultivated or farmed. It means too that what did they do for economy(Eg. Rice cultivating, corn or bean, nut farming). Page 53 shows that how many bazaars or markets are there in Kalay township, most Pyin Khone gyi villagers go to Tahan Bazaar and Let Pan Chaung Bazaar that are near their village. Khuado Puai means most Chin people do this festival every year( just for Chin culture knowledge and for about festival). A villager celebrates this festival every year too. Robertklay (talk) 14:05, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Does not mention the village specifically, the township having farms in general does not support the statements you added. That's only one specific issue. The rest of the article is very promotional and poorly sourced. information about Khuado Puai that isn't specific and unique to this village does not belong on a page about this village- it should be on its own article or on Chin people. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 17:26, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- The report does not show a specific details about village but it show a village population, religion, culture, and economy. In Pyin Khone Gyi page, the real thing to express is also just population or geographical datas, that has been also expressed. What specific details need to show more about village. A village economy is agriculture and that is still need to show more details from other sources. Some information are already expressed in GAD report that are also cited with website link. Robertklay (talk) 11:04, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Does not mention the village specifically, the township having farms in general does not support the statements you added. That's only one specific issue. The rest of the article is very promotional and poorly sourced. information about Khuado Puai that isn't specific and unique to this village does not belong on a page about this village- it should be on its own article or on Chin people. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 17:26, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- If there are no sources talking about it, it should not be on Wikipedia. The Kalaymyo Township report page 30 and page 53 do not talk about the village. They talk about the agricultural and retail statistics of the township, not the village or village tract. Your new link to the Khuado Puai has no mention of the village either. Original research and using photos and maps is not allowed (see: WP:OR). EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 13:19, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- A page is for Pyin Khone Gyi village, which is under Pyin Khone Gyi Tract, Kalaymyo Township, Sagaing Region. It means Pyin Khone Gyiis that a village tract too. In Pyin Khone Gyi tract, there are seven villages groups; Pyin Khone Gyi, Yauk Cho Kwin, Pyi Daw THar, Thae Kung Nan, Maw Si, Segyi, Kan Thar. A village business and local market situation are showed in Kalaymyo business status like most peole go to Tahan Bazaar or Market. In town level or village level, they don't have specific declaration or information announced about local markets. These mean that a place we add or creating a page may face with many difficulties. Or if we need to add more specific photos or photo maps.Thanks for your patience. Robertklay (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:47, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.