Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pylon in the artificial lake of Santa Maria
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Lukmanier Powerline. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-31 05:59Z
- Pylon in the artificial lake of Santa Maria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Another electricity pylon from the systematic cleanup. There is certainly a claim of notability here. This unique 75m tower is located in the middle of a lake, and was constructed on a raft of concrete to stop corrosion from the lake water. I find it pretty bog standard as they come. and it's not a tall structure either. Is there anything of real merit here? Ohconfucius 10:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unremarkable pylon, just like most of the others. MER-C 10:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A pylon! Well now I know where I'm booking my next summer vacation!! ... wait... no. Delete. -/- Warren 11:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - From the article (emphasis added): "It is a part of Lukmanier Powerline and is the only pylon in Switzerland (perhaps even the only in Europe) standing in a lake." With an assertion of notability weak enough to include the word perhaps, I'm pretty sure this can be safely deleted. Charlie 11:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless there is some evidence of significance. Guy (Help!) 13:24, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and smerge to article on lake if such exists. If there is no article on the lake, move this to an appropriate title for one and copyedit/expand it so that it mainly covers the lake itself. the lake is notable enough for an article (partly because of this pylon), but the pylon itself should be mentioned only on the lake's page. Grutness...wha? 00:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete can't see what is really special about this.-- danntm T C 02:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.