Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyraminx Diamond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pyraminx Duo. (non-admin closure) - TheMagnificentist 18:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pyraminx Diamond

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not apparently a variation of Pyraminx Duo - see this edit comment. No evidence of notability for this unsourced toy. PamD 22:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Skewb?: Pinging the editor whose edit summary I mentioned above. PamD 21:20, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Pyraminx Duo. It appears to be a similar toy, and I'm not sure the discussion of whether it's actually a variant or not is actually relevant. I see no independent notability, but plenty of non-independent (stores, etc.) sources to demonstrate that it really exists. Jclemens (talk) 03:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:53, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.