Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QMagazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

QMagazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any significant independent coverage. Article does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MEDIA. In my opinion, this page should be a redirect to Q (magazine). Brilliantine (talk) 13:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Despite fairly lengthy time in existence, the magazine doesn't seem to have built up much (or any) notability under WP:NMEDIA. Also, do not redirect to Q (magazine) which is a much, much different publication. In fact, this newer magazine in the present discussion is likely to cause unfair confusion with Q (magazine), here and elsewhere. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, I'm only saying it should be redirected as a plausible mis-spelling of the major magazine Q. I am not suggesting there is any link between the two publications. So I would say this page be deleted and a new redirect established. Brilliantine (talk) 17:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Understood! Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:40, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 00:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A7 product with no third party sources. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.