Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadel InfoCenter
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Quadel InfoCenter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Utterly non-notable and possibly not yet released browser. No references provided. The author, user:Ravenperch provides a link to his website which is still under construction. I am also nominating PLPI by the same author for deletion. Sgroupace (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE This is a non notable article and does not deserve being here --Notedgrant (talk) 21:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no assertion of notability etc. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 07:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Zero WP:GHITS. That's pretty damning for a piece of software. --Cybercobra (talk) 07:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both: Zero hits for both. Joe Chill (talk) 15:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - totally non-notable and unsourced to boot. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.