Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quaid-e-Azam Model School
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No sourced evidence of notability argued or provided. joe deckertalk to me 19:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Quaid-e-Azam Model School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable school with no reliable source supporting its existence. SMS Talk 16:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I can confirm it exists, but I can't yet tell whether its equivalent to a high school.--Milowent • hasspoken 17:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong| communicate _ 22:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, we'd need good evidence that this place even exists before we have an article on it. Nyttend (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not seeing any evidence that the school even exists, let alone is notable enough to warrant an article here. --DAJF (talk) 04:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: until proven it even exists. All highschools are considered notable per WP:NHS but there's no reason to believe that this one is actually a real one. --lTopGunl (talk) 10:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.