- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:24, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Quantum Content (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Obscure neologism. Article seems to be part of "EndPlay" company marketing Bhny (talk) 16:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Found no independent reliable sources that use the term as it's meant here. (There are many other uses of the term, particularly in physics; there's an unrelated company called Quantum Content, and other writers invent their own independent definitions). The person who coined the phrase wrote an editorial for Forbes, but this is not an independent reliable source. The Wikipedia article currently cites a number of sources all connected to the same person/company, including a press release and a marketing piece for a panel discussion, which are also not independent reliable sources. It's possible I overlooked references to this, because it's such a commonly used phrase in academic literature (e.g., on scholar.google.com or books.google.com) and in general, so if anyone finds any, please link them and I'll reconsider.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 03:28, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as a WP:NEOLOGISM. There are definitions all over the map (in physiology?), but this particular one is the least worthy of an unnotable bunch. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.