Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quarter Circle Forward

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 11:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not particularly notable internet radio show. No claims of notability, press coverage, etc... My vote is clearly delete. Wickethewok 18:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, i get the feeling this nom is in response to my vote on another article arikane

• To what are you referring exactly? Wickethewok 20:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• well this nom was put up shortly after my vote on Lightsaber combat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arikane (talk • contribs)

• Ah, my response to that nom was no vote. If indeed I had such a visceral opinion on deleting/keeping that article, I probably would've voted. Wickethewok 12:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I don't think so; I've thought about putting this article up for deletion myself ever since the AfD for The Greatness. Voice of Treason 22:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• NO VOTE from wikipedia notablility page: "The content is distributed via a site which is independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster.[7]" vgamp, real life radio, and rant radio seem to fit as independent broadcasters. antmoney85

• Comment They're no longer carried on Rant; vgamp has an Alexa rank close to 2 million, and real life radio doesn't seem to register on Alexa at all. Fan1967 15:48, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Relist this maybe? Wickethewok 17:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Between being carried on Rant, vgamp and real life radio, an argument can be made that they are independently distributed. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a non-notable show. It's my reading of WP policy (whether or not my reading is accurate is obviously open to debate) that an independent distributor has to be a notable independent distributor. If my crap site hosts your crap comic strip, it doesn't make your comic important. -- Kicking222 23:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • theres a big difference between hosting and broadcasting live streams.Antmoney85 19:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The non-notability demonstrated by their difficulty getting aired. BlueValour 02:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.