Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quazer Beast (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transferred to Wikipedia namespace because I wished to preserve the edit history and I've got an idea for the text. Any recreations of this in the article space should be treated as db-repost unless actual sources appear. Mackensen (talk) 00:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was deleted before as either original research or hoax. I list it here for AfD instead of using db-repost because there are more than 1 contributors. Zoz (t) 22:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, only Ghits are forks from the article on other sites. SM247 23:16, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per original nomination. — WCityMike ^(T | C)  ⇓ plz reply HERE  (why?) ⇓  23:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• It's a somewhat charming article, despite (because of?) being a hoax. I suggest moving it to Wikipedia:Society for the Preservation of the Quazer Beast or something along those lines. Mackensen (talk) 00:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not verified. Naconkantari 00:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I second Mackensen's suggestion. Save the Quazer Beast! (But delete from article space, alas.) Madame Sosostris 00:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.