- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 21:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Queens Crossing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Shopping Center - was CSD'd in July. No notability established, no references. Wikipedia is not a shopping directory, and nothing about this article is encyclopedic. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added a few referendces, including one from The New York Times. -- Eastmain (talk) 13:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- Eastmain (talk) 13:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - The mall seems to have a few articles written about it but nothing substantial enough to qualify as notable. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A tiny shopping center with 110,000 to 120,000 square feet of retail space, per refs of the article, far below even a regional mall. Edison (talk) 19:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Only for the NY Times coverage. Warrah (talk) 22:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The NYTimes coverage is only incidentally about this shopping center. At 190,000 sq ft, it's below the level we usually include. DGG ( talk ) 04:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I cannot see that this has more than very local interest. NYTimes falls short of really significant coverage being only a couple of paragraphs in a much bigger article. Polargeo (talk) 12:29, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - despite the New York Times article, overall this is not a really notable mall, due to insubstantial mentions in the news, and is too new to be notable. Bearian (talk) 19:09, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.