- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Notability not established. Merge with the software company that made it if you want (see me for an undelete to your userspace) but too small a nugget for a separate article. --++Lar: t/c 02:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable software; excelsoftware.com product articles being mass-created [1]. Haakon 20:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination. Nertz 00:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with the rest. Adspam. Fan1967 00:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per reasoning explained on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinA&D.--Ligulem 07:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Merge into WinA&D and keep the remaining redirect (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinA&D, which should be kept). --Ligulem 08:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Mass Delete. A couple hundred different hits on Google for QuickCRC [2], we're not exactly talking Rational Rose here [3] despite what the author seems to think. Wikipedia is not a catalogue of all existing software applications. Equendil Talk 07:12, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SoftwareDeveloper 01:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)This text is a non-promotional variation of what is on Excel Software's site with full permission. Below is a partial list of articles that follow the same format.[reply]
Are you proposing that all of these articles be deleted?
- Is there any way I get can you to stop posting that list? Aguerriero (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.