- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Quick Freedom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spam, and lack of notability. Abc518 (talk) 00:24, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- (Deletion log); 19:26 . . Skomorokh (talk | contribs) deleted "Quick Freedom" (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)
- Was deleted once already --Abc518 (talk) 01:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam and salt due to previous deletion as spam. RayTalk 01:59, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable; spam; couldn't this be speedy if prev deleted? Chzz ► 04:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete & Salt Unable to find any reliable source coverage. Salt to prevent WP:ARTSPAM. --Cybercobra (talk) 04:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.