Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quicksys RegDefrag
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 02:51, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Quicksys RegDefrag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software. Joe Chill (talk) 04:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notable sources that could help this article on a encyclopedia, all I saw on Google (Google News as well) and Yahoo! searches were review and download websites and the company's website. SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:06, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete gnews just shows product listings. no indepth coverage to meet WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Leaning towards delete, lead appears copy and pasted (with a tiny rephrase) from here and here. The software did make [http://download.cnet.com/Quicksys-RegDefrag/3000-2094_4-10844188.html download.com, but so do a lot of programs. --Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! 09:29, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No relaible sources to establish notability. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 11:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.