Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quidi Vidi Brewing Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:39, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CORP. Deprodded. - CrazyRussian talk/email 21:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Withdrawn - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:39, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not particularly notable yet. Cassavau 21:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep. The most popular microbrew in Newfoundland, the largest microbrewer in Atlantic Canada, and no less notable than any of the microbrews listed in Category:Beer and breweries in Canada. BoojiBoy 00:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been noted on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Newfoundland and Labrador. BoojiBoy 00:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep. There is absolutely no reason to delete this article. As User Boojiboy said, it IS the most popular microbrew in Newfoundland. It definitely meets the first criterion of WP:CORP, as it has been featured in numerous newspapers, magazines, and documentaries (I'll have to do some digging to find it). --Crabbyass 02:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Any of these would work: [1] [2] [3] BoojiBoy 02:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Copied from the talk page and written by Crabbyass: "They've applied to be listed on the TSX, won Silver Medal at the 2001 World Beer Championship in Chicago Illinois, and will soon be expanding its distribution to all provinces in Canada, the United States, Mexico, Iceland, Germany, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Switzerland & Lichtenstein, New Zealand, and Australia." Yet another assertion of notability. BoojiBoy 13:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Very notable brewery in Newfoundland (I don't think you'd find many Newfies who wouldn't know of it). OzLawyer 16:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A significant Newfoundland company, and evidence of the weakness of WP:CORP as a basis for decision-making. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 03:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.