Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quik (boot loader)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 11:53, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Notability per WP:SOFTWARE is not apparent, Wikipedia is not Sourceforge. Sandstein 14:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Edgar181 15:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Mirror Vax 20:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep How is this NOT notable? Lots of google hits, mentions in gentoo's install manual, has notable features (not requiring a MacOS partition). If you are going to delete this you might as well delete GRUB and LILO. kotepho 01:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Abstain as article creator. The bootloader situation is a little strange, as very few of them really qualify as notable (GRUB and LILO are obvious exceptions). I put it in mostly because it's the follow-up to BootX; I actually don't run PPC Linux so I can't say how common it is. Haikupoet 03:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: WP:SOFTWARE is "a proposed Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process," and is thus not binding. Even if WP:SOFTWARE is binding, it is far from clear that this article doesn't meet the draft criteria. Simon Dodd 14:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.