Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quill and Dagger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep, after discounting invalid votes. Deathphoenix ʕ 13:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article is unverifiable, contains original research, and is self-promoting. Lmgs 15:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Article is verifiable. Press releases and news articles have widely covered membership and facts about the society. For example: [Sandy Berger][Stephen Hadley][Meeting space][Contribution to War Memorial] Those came up without much searching, I'm positive many more references are out there online and in print. I'm guessing this AFD has some sort of personal agenda attached to it, especially considering Lmgs seems to have registered on Wikipedia just to do this. 2afterblue
• Keep -I see no reason to remove this article. -Mercuryboard 19:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I beleive that this article should be kept online. The membership of this society genrates a genuine public interest; and the content fits with the greater topic of Collegiate Secret Societies -User:C Stewart —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.2.133.84 (talk • contribs) . 19:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Incomplete nomination listed now. - Liberatore(T) 13:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable. Tom Harrison ^Talk 15:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. --Xyrael ^T 17:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete Not notable 67.119.124.137 00:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The easily verifiable public facts (membership is in the public ___domain and basic facts of the society have been formally published in various print & online sources) surrounding both the nature of the society and its prominent membership at Cornell and in various government, industry, and service institutions are no less significant than those of other collegiate secret societies with listings on Wikipedia. Furthermore, the influential American leaders the society has produced are both of public interest and notable significance that distinguish this society from just any other collegiate student organization. 24.59.112.108 14:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.