- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- R.Gopakumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This was declined for speedy deletion because of "international exhibitions". However this has been speedy deleted twice and recreated each time. As well, there is an obvious conflict of interest as the files uploaded by the editor are indicated as owned by the artist. The text itself shifts from first- to third-person. In any case, there is no evidence of notability. The artist has not had any major exhibitions and there are no reliable sources provided. A google search reveals only commercial or unrelated sites. This clearly fails WP:BIO. freshacconci talktalk 10:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —freshacconci talktalk 10:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - Srikanth (speak) 11:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Johnbod (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nn and above...Modernist (talk) 21:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per nom. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and salt. Autobio, non-notable. --MrStalker (talk) 22:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.