Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R.O.C. (band) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (withdrawn). (non-admin closure) JayJay^{What did I do?} 05:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

R.O.C. (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band, has no reason to suggest notability. JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the previous AfD. Online coverage seems rather minimal (e.g., [1][2][3]), but what about the apparent significant coverage in print sources (Melody Maker, NME, Q magazine, Select, The Wire) identified during the previous discussion? I agree that this is not a reliable source, but the information contained in these works can be verified.  Gong show 05:11, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I have to agree with Gongshow. This is a band from the past century, and thus I don't expect a lot of online coverage, specially since they are not releasing new music. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 06:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per the previous AfD. --Michig (talk) 07:45, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.