Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RECESSION

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as a blatant copyright infringement (CSD G12). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RECESSION (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

not encyclopedic, theres already an article on it Letsdrinktea (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to be some kind of rant or essay. Jtrainor (talk) 22:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete as copyvio of this, tagged as such. ascidian | talk-to-me 22:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.