- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 20:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- RG7351 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WikiProject Chemistry and WikiProject Pharmacology require chemical compounds to meet the general notability guideline to be included in Wikipedia. This is not a notable chemical compound. Beyond the one reference in the article (which contains nothing about RG7351 beyond a single listing in a large table of data), there are no reliable sources mentioning this drug candidate. It did not advance beyond the very earliest stages of clinical trials. There is no mention of this compound in scientific journals (no hits in Chemical Abstracts). The infobox is empty because the identity of the chemical compound is proprietary information and was never made public. ChemNerd (talk) 15:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It's hard to get less notable than this and still exist at all. Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, it is not notable, it is only one item in a list. Spumuq (talq) 12:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.