- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge and redirect. Singularity 17:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- RKBA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article defines an abbreviation of the term "Right to Keep and Bear Arms", a subject already covered in Right to arms: Nomination per WP:DICT. Estemi (talk) 07:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to right to arms, which already lists it as an alternate title. Doesn't need a separate article, but certainly should point to the topic. --Dhartung | Talk 07:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Dhartung. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect It has already been noted, but I don't feel that the initials are notable enough for their own article aside from what is already mentioned in Right to arms. Lazulilasher (talk) 21:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Right to arms - acronyms don't need an article unless they themselves are notable. In this case, even if it was notable, there wouldn't be enough content to warrant it's own article. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 22:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per above. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect already. Definitely not a delete, and not a disambig. JJB 20:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.