- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. BigDom 14:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Race to Nowhere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. The contester's rationale was good enough so I have undeleted the article and placed it on AfD instead. No vote from me. JIP | Talk 19:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and allow continued work. While the original article was indeed an unsourced stub ( I can suppose the author never heard of working in userspace), a news search finds the film being discussed in depth and detail in multiple reliable sources[1] thus meeting the criteria at WP:NF. It definitely has WP:POTENTIAL, and WP:ATD encourages that it be improved to meet that potential. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per significant coverage in reliable sources.--BelovedFreak 17:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; seems notable enough and is referenced in many external sources. InverseHypercube (talk) 06:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article now has several citations of reviews in reliable sources. Indeed I consulted this article after seeing the film referenced in Slate. Easchiff (talk) 08:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The film appears to be culturally significant as part of an overall educational reform movement. Clearly it needs improvements but its continuing touring status makes it worthy of a decent source of reference. MariaMitchell (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.