Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racers (Conspiracy theory)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:16, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Racers (Conspiracy theory)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable political neologism. See WP:NEO. No coverage of the term in reliable sources (all of the cited sources are either don't satisfy WP:RS or don't mention the term at all), which means that the article fails Notability criteria. And, no, Tony Katz's twitter feed doesn't count. Neither does Examiner.com, a user-generated news/blog website. Basically, the entire article is an essay of original research and thought based off something a Tea Partier said on TV. GrapedApe (talk) 04:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that notability has not been established - no substantial coverage in reliable 3rd-party sources. Dawn Bard (talk) 11:32, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I concur; this is too much of a neologism. Let's see if it takes off - but for now, delete. DS (talk) 14:40, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. & others. Clearly a non-notable neologism.--JayJasper (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.