Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Lin Weaver
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 03:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Rachel Lin Weaver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any significant work. A temporary exhibition in a museum does not meet WP:CREATIVE DGG ( talk ) 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. My PRod was removed with the reasoning " took part in exhibit at major museum". Thats not enough in my book. Pyrusca (talk) 00:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No notability, sourced with non-viable niche citations and artist's own website. sixtynine • speak up • 00:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- SNOW Delete as I concur with the nomination, absolutely no meaningful and convincing substance for artists notability. SwisterTwister talk 01:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.