Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rad Luck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rad Luck

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Rad Luck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable musician with 0 independent sources and no in depth coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 12:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I attempted to draftify this article to allow it to prove itself, but it was moved back in and I'm not seeing anything to denote notability. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I am seeing no indication of coverage in any reliable sources. All of the references used are either self-published Soundcloud links or primary lyric links. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Creator was given the chance to develop the article in draftspace but chose to move it back to mainspace without much, if any, improvement. Sourcing is not good – 'Soundcloud'and Youtube, Instagram and lyric listings. Does not demonstrate that the subject can pass NMUSIC or GNG Eagleash (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Move into draft space, article is subject of WP:TOOSOON and I think more info should be added to it to before creation under WP:WOOD.  Apollo825  ^{- talk to me baby -} 15:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't move spammy articles with fake sources to incubate in draft space. Toosoon only applies if there's a reasonable expectation of notability, we don't just assume everything is "too soon" to be notable. Praxidicae (talk) 16:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Apollo825, This was already done and the page creator moved it back to mainspace. Draftifying is thus not an option. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:48, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Repeatedly moved out of draftspace by contributor despite being draftified, a clear attempt to WP:GAME the system. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.