- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. east.718 at 06:11, November 24, 2007
- Radical Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Org. fails to establish notability Lugnuts 18:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh 05:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm not convinced it fails Notability, but for sure the article reads like an ad. Torc2 (talk) 09:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn and it does read like an advertisement -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep It does read like an add, but could have been a well know underground indie label. Can it be re-written with more sources. scope_creep (talk) 12:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.