Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiclib (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:20, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neologism. Transwikied. Google hits all appear to come from Wikipedia or mirrors. Survived previous AfD in October 2005. TheProject 17:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not just a neologism, but stated as such in the first sentence of the article. The article can never be expanded beyond what it is now. If it's already transwikied, then there's nothing else to do with the word but kill its WP page. -- Kicking222 17:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT a dictionary Ydam 17:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Kicking. RGTraynor 18:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I agree that this is a dicdef, and agree that dicdefs are inappropriate for an encyclopedia. But can something that's been in use since 1970 really be considered a neologism? ergot 15:08, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removed adjective. I'm just a little used to calling any constructed portmanteau a neologism. :-) TheProject 15:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.