Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radioactive decay path
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Decay chain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
article is a poor replication of decay chain Deglr6328 04:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to decay chain, though if any salient info is covered in this article and not in decay chain, it could be merged over upon deletion. Fabricationary 04:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Delete/Redirect I'm the one who was bored and (barely) slavaged the steaming pile of dookie it was before, but I agree that decay chain is better, still some of the important points should be merged into decay chian, like the age of the earth, and particle accelerator products infered from decay products. Also, I don't see Uranium 238 as any of the tables on decay chain. And just as a side note radioactive decay path was started in Oct/2004 and decay chain was started in Mar/2003 so there's no need to be snippy about 'poor replication' :P. Tiki God 05:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to decay chain, because some people may search by this name...but there's no real need to keep the content as far as I see, so delete that. Byrgenwulf 07:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect, though there is little to merge. Forking. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 10:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to decay chain. There really isn't anything to merge. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.