Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radisson Riverfront Hotel Windsor
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable hotel; the hole in the ground next to it may be a local political issue that deserves an article, but the hotel itself is just another Radisson. Brianyoumans 02:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom; it's nonsense. - CobaltBlueTony 02:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Tenth, soon-to-be-11th tallest building in Windsor. Uh, no. Nor is a visible logo the same as a landmark. [1] --Dhartung | Talk 02:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wikitravel. Nothing special about this hotel. --Oakshade 05:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment We can't transwiki to Wikitravel. --Coredesat 06:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A building which fails to assert significance. Resolute 05:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. MER-C 10:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, does not really meet the notability criteria, nothing significant of the hotel. So what if the Radisson logo can be seen from Detroit? I can see Batam from Sentosa on a clear day. Nothing notable at all. --Terence Ong (C | R) 12:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom -- Whpq 15:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete there is nothing notable about this building, even under WP:LOCAL.--Isotope23 16:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.