- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (Non admin closure). Qst 12:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability of the group is questionable; the article doesn't answer it. I cannot find satisfactory answers on the net either (in English). The article isn't even well written, and is not suitable for English Wikipedia in its current form. huji—TALK 20:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keilanatalk(recall) 01:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 06:48, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, they seem to have a rather lengthy and well-sourced article on the Japanese Wikipedia: ja:RADWIMPS. My high-school Japanese has almost rusted away, but the links seem to imply that they've released material on Virgin and EMI, which would mean they meet WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil (talk) 11:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Weak keep per their AMG discography - if they have released two full-length albums on EMI that should be WP:MUSIC addressed.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.