Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raidashir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:59, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Raidashir

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Raidashir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a piece of epic fantasy WP:OR / hoax. This figure never existed as far as I can see. Been tagged since 2009 (almost 10 years). - LouisAragon (talk) 11:52, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Tried to verify some of the details with little success. No cited sources. Fails WP:V. Icewhiz (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:OR material. If you google it, almost all results are based on this WP article. I couldn't find even a single reliable source for it. Also, the only article that links to it is Tun Ledang Shah. Both article created by 202.186.157.3 and sound like made-up stuff. --Wario-Man (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A search of Google books and Jstor resulted in nothing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the fact that this uncited article has existed for nine years is a sad commentary on how easy it is to create article on Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• DElete -- The whole thing seems wholly improbable: it does not even seem to be an article that is supposed to be about a single person. It even cites rumour which is certainly not a reliable source. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.