Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rail Sim Pro (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to N3V Games. Davewild (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rail Sim Pro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreleased software by a long defunct company. Fails notability standards by a mile. Article was kept at AfD nine years ago, but notability standards have evolved since then and in any event, a decided plurality at the 1st AfD favored deletion. Good time as any to try again. Safiel (talk) 01:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not to mention entirely unsourced for all these years. Safiel (talk) 01:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to N3V Games, the developer. Please consider performing easy redirects yourself before coming to AfD. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search under its short or official name. Please {{ping}} me if you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 02:10, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to N3V Games, the developer. Software article of unclear notability, but the dev. is notable and redirects from titles to developers a common solution in this case.Dialectric (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to N3V Games as per the above. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.