Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railway missing links (2nd nomination)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 06:01, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article survived a VFD back in April Yes i read VFD results from back then to learn from some VFD mistakes i done recently but it only got One Vote to Merge and the result was Merge to I dont know where which it really aint anything. This article is one of the worst written I Have Ever Seen So Confusing.Reads like a News Bullten also.Strong Delete --Aranda56 01:31, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete for vagueness. How can you objectively identify places that aren't connected by rail but should be? Gazpacho 02:37, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for impossibility of becoming encyclopedic, as Gazpacho notes. The single paragraph about Turkey to Georgia to Azerbaijan might be usable as part of Railroads of Turkey or the Transport section of Turkey; the second is just "A UN official said [blah blah blah]." --MCB 07:57, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not only that but there's also scores of places without a train station which should have one. This can't possibly be neutral. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:58, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per MCB CLW 17:47, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.