- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:36, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity, soapbox, attempt to contact, nn, etc. Delete CLW 14:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a reprint of a personal essay, something that violates the no original research precept. (aeropagitica) 15:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per users (aeropagitica) and CLW.--blue520 15:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator, I even had trouble understanding what it was about. JIP | Talk 15:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even if translated into readable English, would still be OR, vanity and soapbox per above. Googling his name is impossible, as it's a pretty common name, and turns up a lot of people. The organization does not appear to be notable. Fan1967 20:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.