Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajinder Kumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rajinder Kumar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable footballer, has not received significant coverage, never played for a fully-pro team. Fails WP:NFOOTY and more importantly WP:GNG. Also the sources he gave to a match report dont help as the player is not listed as playing. PROD was contested without giving a reason. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 13:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - claims he has played in I-League are unverified; he appears to fail WP:NFOOTBALL and definitely fails WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 13:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 September 18. Snotbot t • c » 13:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as unverified. Unless the claim that he played in the I-League can be verified, he fails WP:NSPORT and he has not received sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ - article claims that Kumar has played in a fully pro league, but that claim is unsourced, which means that the article fails WP:NFOOTY, and should be deleted unless the claim can be verified. Article also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:26, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - as he has played in a fully pro league and passes WP:NFOOTY. Article needs improvement though. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fully pro cup. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 19:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator Comment: He has now officially played in his first official match today (see here) but of course he fails GNG still so I will let you guys decide. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 20:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes the article, needs more reliability edits, although, from the sources the projects, clearly shows a good verification and the documents it needs while the athlete was in the pro league.--GoShow (...............) 04:34, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article does not meet GNG. Eldumpo (talk) 10:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 15:34, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 02:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable imho. —Zujine|talk 06:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why? --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 10:07, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.