- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Dakota 05:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Software; fails WP:SOFTWARE. Nehwyn 10:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 11:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Hello32020 20:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Noteworthy software (first of its kind) Hazer 20:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you got any independent reliable source stating that? --Nehwyn 20:51, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, being "first of its kind" is not a criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia. Lots and lots of software was "first of its kind" and still completely unnotable, and this looks like a case in point. On top of that, the article is borderline spam. Xtifr tälk 00:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Point conceded. In the face of all the controversy surrounding Wikipedia, I must say that the community is rather strict about adherence to policy. I admit, after becoming more familiar with WP:SOFTWARE, that it's too early for this entry and will only resubmit after it gains verifiable public notability. Hazer 05:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That's very fair and reasonable of you. --Nehwyn 07:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.