Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramit Sethi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The sources provided by Whpq mean the subject is clearly notable. (non-admin closure) Regards, MacMed^talk_stalk 21:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ramit_Sethi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is blatant self promotion. Ramit is nothing but one of many business, who write blogs/sell "mantra" to make you rich in a night. Having a wikipedia link sort of make such actions official. This link was already deleted once before, but seems like he has created it once again. Mohitranka (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - He is a NY Times besst-selling author as verified here. He is identified as notable finance blogger. The Houston Chronicle has covered him, as the SF Chronicle. there's quite a bit more, but this is sufficient to establish him as notable. -- Whpq (talk) 17:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Sources noted above indicate that notability exists for this subject. As an aside - this is listed as the third nomination, any idea where the first two went? This article has no entries in the Deletion log, so it has not been deleted previously (under this name). UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 18:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I believe it is in error due to a misunderstanding on the part of an inexperienced editor. Is was prodded and declined (deletion #1), a malformed AFD was submitted and reverted (deletion #2), and then finally this AFD was created (deletion #3). It is in fact, the first nomination and perhaps some knowledgeable editor/admin can fix this. -- Whpq (talk) 20:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Done, now that I know what the deal is. Thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 01:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'll leave most of the links to the 3rd nom, as well as the redirect. The log and the article both point here directly. Once the thing closes, I'll clean up the rest. If necessary. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 02:16, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! So? People are hungry for help & knowledges. He has some EDU. Do U, sis /bro? That you can help too? Maybe mentor, cohort, anything to help rather than to tear down please! The Netflix part is lucrative too in helping to spread right human relationships -each & all w/ea. other!! other! (While still time & good available. B4 we pass the PONr.)

The world’s people need each other. Get with the program! Puh-leeez. <g>! xoxo 😚 75.100.215.165 (talk) 18:00, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.