Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Alcorn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Alcorn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Randy Alcorn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to pass WP:GNG. A promotional attempt WP:PROMO - "Content made for Advertising, marketing, or public relations purposes". Calling for an AfD Discussion. Hatchens (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The creator of this article is JoAnn Hayes has also created articles Rachel Goenka and Andrew Busey which are the Wikipedia pages of non-notable entities. I have raised similar concern at Andrew Busey's AfD discussion page - Three big articles with lifetime edit history clocking just 41? Something is not right. -Hatchens (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The origins of this article reek of inapropriate use of Wikipedia. We need to stand up against such use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 16:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom as well Balle010 (talk) 16:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG, while also being a clear WP:PROMO piece. KidAd (💬💬) 19:22, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.