Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Glass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Glass

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a WP:BLP1E whose only working source doesn't appear reliable. I feel like most of the WP:BLP issues have already been removed, but what's left doesn't seem to show how WP:GNG is met, and most of the information I can find appears to only exist on sites of dubious reliability. (Note: I ran across this article because a recent version is about an artist about the same name, which I have removed as a copyvio and because it overwrote this content; whether content about that artist belongs at this title is a matter for another discussion.) Kinu ^t/_c 23:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:32, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep - per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I added a new book reference to the article. I think the WP:GOLDEN RULE has been satisfied here. ~KvnG 00:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.