Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Rigby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 00:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Rigby

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources tend to be more PR releases than news articles, and nothing shows that Rigby is actually a notable businessman. John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 02:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:GNG with articles like this and this. Please do your WP:BEFORE work before nominating. Rikster2 (talk) 00:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:GNG, per Rikster2. Ejgreen77 (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's hard to imagine the president of an NBA team, with 30 years of front-office experience wouldn't meet WP:GNG, and Rigby does with significant coverage like this. [1]. The breadth of coverage is tremendous. The nominator should be a little bit red-faced about nominating this one. Spurious AfD nominations are disruptive to the community.Jacona (talk) 12:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.