Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rap Snacks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 17:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rap Snacks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It is not directly related to notability, but it is worth bearing in mind with this article that it has been edited by an unusually high number of WP:SPAs and promotional language has been seriously toned down, but not completely. Some sources, but not enough. Boleyn (talk) 08:04, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Entirely promotional, fails WP:SPIP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a minor brand / promotionalism only. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.