Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raritan Computer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sango123 02:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity corporate page (see article discussion page). cholmes75 (chit chat) 03:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Clean and Keep I've heard of them. And if you do a search, it's 3 million hits. Requires cleanup of ad-like claims, though. CP/M 03:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep if you can get rid of the ad content. I like how you can vote to keep pages here! Nertz 05:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn computer firm. All the Ghits are catalogs and portals, SOP business listings. I don't think WP is a Phone Book, and the material is not encyclopedic, with or without the advert language. Tychocat 05:19, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - very well known KVM switch manufacturer just unfortunately written as an ad. If the ad content goes then we have a stub of a notable company. - Peripitus 09:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Muiltiple news coverage [1] easily passes WP:CORP. Needs rewriting per Peripitus. Kevin 10:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the ad content, and put a stub tag on it. Kevin 10:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Comment, if it "easily passes WP:CORP" then the article should be updated to reflect this. Right now what I see in the article falls completely short of WP:CORP.--Isotope23 16:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep current version. Colonel Tom 11:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Given the rewrite, I change my vote to Keep. Nice work, Kevin.--cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Kevin fixed it up quite nicely. TruthbringerToronto 16:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, much better after cleanup. --Terence Ong 16:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep as above. Xyrael ^T 19:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please it is fixed and meets our standards Yuckfoo 00:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, notable company - 10%/20% of the news clippings probably meet WP:CORP, seems to be a top 5 leader in KVM switch products. Article is much less painful after clean-up; thanks for taking the time, Kevin. Kuru ^talk 03:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Seems to be a worthwhile company that makes KVM switches. Needs clean up. I do not agree with Kevin1243's link to Raritan PR page, however, as press releases are not part of WP:CORP. Kevin_b_er 06:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.